Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Narrative and Institutional Economics

Narrative and Institutional Economics

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 9 (no. 4),

This article addresses a range of questions associated with the occurrence of a new field of study – narrative economics, which is considered in the context of modern institutionalism. Pioneering works of R. Shiller, G. Akerlof and D. Snower spotlighted the importance of analyzing narratives and narrative influence when studying economic processes. In this paper, a qualitative study of narratives is seen through the prism of an answer to the question: «How do prescribed narratives influence institutions and change them? ». Narratives have much in common with institutions since very often, explicitly or implicitly, they contain value judgements about social interactions or normative aspects shaping behavioral patterns. The identification of dominating narratives enables us to understand better how institutions influence economic (social) action. Repeated interactions among social actors are structured through understanding and learning the rules. Understanding of social rules comes from the language – we articulate and perceive the rules drawing on common narratives. Narratives and institutions are helpful when actors gain knowledge about various forms of social communication. Digital technologies, mass media and social networking sites facilitate the spread of narratives, values and beliefs; this process is characterized by increasing returns. Studying narratives and institutions is crucial for modern economic theory because it helps to improve qualitative and quantitative methods of analyzing empirical evidence and enables researchers to understand complex economic processes.

Keywords: institutional economics; narrative economics; rules; norms; institutions

  • Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Random House and London: Profile.
  • Akerlof, G. A. and Snower, D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 58–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.021.
  • Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. (2010). Identity Economics: How Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. The American economic review, 84(1), 406–411.
  • Bookstaber, R. (2017). The End of Theory. DOI: 10.1515/9781400884964.
  • Colander, D. (2009). 2 Moving beyond the rhetoric of pluralism. Economic pluralism. Routledge.
  • Colander, D. (2014). The Wrong Type of Pluralism: Toward a Transdisciplinary Social Science. Review of Political Economy, 26(4), 516–525. DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2014.950460.
  • Collier, P. (2016). The cultural foundations of economic failure: A conceptual toolkit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 5–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.017.
  • Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, 21, 648–657.
  • Damodaran, A. (2017). Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Business. New York; Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia Business School Publishing.
  • Dawkins, R. (2013). A selfish gene. М.: AST, Corpus. (In Russian).
  • Dwyer, R. and Emerald, E. (2017). Narrative Research in Practice: Navigating the Terrain // Dwyer R., Davis I., Emerald E. (eds) Narrative Research in Practice. Singapore: Springer.
  • Evstigneeva, N. V. and Oberemko, O. A. (2007). Narrative analysis models. Human. Community. Management, 4, 95–107. (In Russian).
  • Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1956). The dilemma of specialization. The state of social sciences. Ed. by L. White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hindriks, F. and Guala, F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: a unified theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 459–480. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137414000496.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2008). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Terra Economicus, 6(2), 8–21. (In Russian).
  • Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221–234. DOI: 10.1257/089533006776526076.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgments under uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge.
  • Kreiswirth, M. (1992). Trusting the Tale: The Narrativist Turn in the Human Sciences. New Literary History, 23(3), 629. DOI: 10.2307/469223.
  • Krugman, P., Wells, R. and Olney, M. I. (2011). Essentials of Economics. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russian).
  • Kutkovaya, E. S. (2014). Narrative in the study of identity. National psychological journal. National Psychological Journal, № 4(16), 23–33. (In Russian).
  • Lekhtsier, V. (2013). Narrative Turn and the Actuality of the Narrative Mind. International Journal of Cultural Research, 1(10), 5–8. (In Russian).
  • McCloskey, D. N. (2016). Max U versus Humanomics: a critique of neo-institutionalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1), 1–27. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137415000053.
  • Mokyr, J. (2016). A Culture of Growth. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1wf4dft.
  • Mordhorst, M. and Schwarzkopf, S. (2017). Theorising narrative in business history. Business History, 59(8), 1155–1175. DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2017.1357697.
  • North, D. (1993). Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction. THESIS, (2), 69–91. (In Russian).
  • North, D. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Roy, D. (2017). Myths about memes. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19 May. DOI: 10.1007/s10818-017-9250-2.
  • Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137405000020.
  • Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative Economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967–1004. DOI: 10.1257/aer.107.4.967.
  • Tambovtsev, V. (2014). Rules as the basis of institutions. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 3. (In Russian).
  • Veblen, T. (1984). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. М. (In Russian).
  • Volchik, V. V. (2003). The failures of economic theory and the dependence on the previous path of development. Terra Economicus, 1(3), 36–42. (In Russian).
  • Volchik, V. V. (2014). Inductive reasoning and economic behavior. Journal of Institutional Studies, 6(3), 6–12. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2241.3762. (In Russian).
  • Volchik, V. V. (2015). Interdisciplinarity in economic science: Between imperialism and pluralism. Terra Economicus, 13(4), 52–64. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297