Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Diversification of the Economy: Institutional Aspects

Diversification of the Economy: Institutional Aspects

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 9 (no. 4),

Institutional conditions are significant factors influencing motivation, behavior and performance results of different economic agents, which, in turn, determine directions and dynamics of structural shifts in the economy. There is a wide range of research on influence of various formal and informal institutions on processes of structural dynamics and diversification of economic activity through innovations in particular. We have carried out in-depth analysis of scientific publications on institutional impact at the level of the country as a whole and regions within countries, comparisons of different countries on the impact of institutional factors on production and technological diversification and their connection to economic development. As the main conceptual approaches, we emphasize evolutionary economics, theory of agglomeration economics and new economic geography. Based on the analysis we draw a conclusion, important for Russian economy, about priority directions of changing spatial and product specialization concerning resource regions of Russia. In conclusion of the article perspective directions for the future research on mutual influence of institutions and changes of production and technological structure, which are vital for Russian economy and its regions, are formulated.


Keywords: diversification of regional economy; production and technological diversification; institutional conditions

References:
  • Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2015). Political Institutions and Comparative Development. NBER Reporter № 2, Research Summary. (http://nber.org/reporter/2015number2/acemoglu.html – Access Date: 11.09.2016).
  • Ageeva, S., Suslov, N. (2011). Social diversity, institutions and economic development: a cross country analysis. Economics Education and Research Consortium, Russia and CIS, M.: EERC, 27 p.
  • Ankudinov, A. B., Beljaeva, M. N., and Lebedev, O. V. (2012). The impact of diversification on the efficiency of the regional economy. Regional economy: theory and practice, 10(31). (In Russian).
  • Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R. and Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional studies, 45(7), 893–904.
  • Boschma, R. and Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44, 1902–1914.
  • Boschma, R. and Frenken, K. (2009). Technological relatedness and regional branching, in Bathelt, H., Feldman, M. P., Kogler, D. F. (eds.) Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation. Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  • Boschma, R. A. and Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311.
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K. and Truffer, B. (2016). Towards a theory of regional diversification. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 16.17, Utrecht University.
  • Cortinovis, N., Jing Xiao, Boschma, R., Frank, G., Van Oort, F. G. (2016). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 16.10, 37 p.
  • Cimoli, M., Dosi, G. and Sitglitz, J. (2009). “The future of industrial policies in the new millenium: toward a Knowledge centred development agenda”. In Cimoli, M., Dosi, G, and Sitglitz, J. Industrial Policy and Development. Oxford: OUP. Ch. 20, 541–560.
  • Dissart, J. C. (2003). Regional economic diversity and regional economic stability: Research results and agenda. International Regional Science Review, 26, 423–446.
  • Eichelkraut, S. (2009). Institutions, innovations and economic policy. Russia’s institutional environment political designing potential from evolutionary approach. Journal of Institutional Studies, 1(1), 36–42. (In Russian).
  • Essletzbichler, J. (2007). Diversity, stability and regional growth in the United States, 1975–2002. In Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography, ed. K. Frenken, 203–29. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Fagerberg, J. and Srholec, M. (2016). Explaining regional economic performance: the role of competitiveness, specialization and capabilities. Papers in Innovation Studies, CIRCLE. WP, 2, 29 p. (http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201602_Fagerberg_Srholec. pdf – Access Date: 01.05.2017).
  • Feldman, M. and Audretsch, D. (1999). Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409–429.
  • Florida, F. and Gates, G. (2003). Technology and tolerance: The importance of diversity to high-technology growth. Research in Urban Policy, 9, 199–219.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F.G., Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., Verburg, T., Boschma, R. (2005). Variety and regional economic growth in the Netherlands. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography. Utrecht.
  • Gurkov, I. B. (2005). The impact of integrated corporate structures on the innovative development of Russian enterprises: an attempt of empirical analysis. Russian Journal of Management, 3(4), 55–66. (In Russian).
  • Hall, P. A., Soskice, D. (eds.): Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. An Introduction. (http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/Terceiros/Cursos/2011/An_Introduction_to_Varieties_of_Capitalism.pdf – Access Date: 18.03.2017).
  • Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., Yildirim, M. (2011). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Cambridge, MA: Puritan Press.
  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., Hausmann, R. (2007). The Product Space Conditions for the Development of Nations. Science 317(5837), 482–487.
  • Kogler, D., Essletzbichler, J., Rigby D. (2017). The evolution of specialization in the EU15 knowledge space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2), 345–373. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308181168_The_evolution_of_specialization_in_the_EU15_knowledge_space – Access Date: 01.05.2017).
  • Kadochnikov, S. M. and Fedyunina, A. A. (2013). Dynamics of export diversification in terms of economic growth: an empirical analysis for Russian regions 2003–2010. Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Ser. Economics and Management. 5, 73–89. (In Russian).
  • Kokorev, R. A. (2008). The role of institutions in the diversification of the Russian Federation economy (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/publications/general_assembly/eitconference/2apram_report_kokorev_eng.pdf – Access Date: 03.02.2017). (In Russian).
  • Kolomak, E. A. (2014). Evolution of spatial distribution of economic activity in Russia. Region: Economics and Sociology, 3, 75–93. (In Russian).
  • Kravchenko, N. A. (2016). Assessment of diversification in the regional economy (Case study of subjects of the Siberian Federal District). Regional Research of Russia, 6(3), 203–213.
  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70, 950–959.
  • Krugman, P. (2011). The new economic geography, now middle-aged. Regional Studies, 45, 1–8.
  • Malkina, M. Yu. (2016). Institutional framework of income inequality in modern economy. Journal of Institutional Studies, 8(1), 100–120. (In Russian).
  • Mikheeva, N. N. (2016). The diversification of regional economic structure as a growth strategy: pros and cons. Region: Economics and Sociology, 4, 196–217. (In Russian).
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M. and Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.
  • Pilyasov, A. N. (2011). New economic geography (NEG) and its potential for studying the location of Russia’s productive forces. Regional Studies, 1. (In Russian).
  • Polischuk, L. and Menashev, R. (2011). Economic significance of social capital. Issues of Economics, 12. (In Russian).
  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. and Trebbi, F., (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47, 1034–1047.
  • Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706.
  • Salnikov, V. (2008). Diversification and export expansion of industrial companies as a factor of the long-term economic growth. CMASP. (In Russian).
  • Shediac, R., Abouchakra, R., Moujaes Ch., Najjar, M. R. (2008). Economic Diversification. The Road to Sustainable Development. Booz &Company. USA.
  • Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.
  • Volchik, V. and Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, D. (2015). Institutions, technologies and increasing returns. Journal of Institutional Studies, 7(1), 45–58. (In Russian).
  • Volchkova, N. (2011). Russian Regions & Russian Firms: Output & Export Diversification. CEFIR WP, 2011.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297