Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Mesolevel as Object of Research in the Scientific Economic Literature of Contemporary Russia

Mesolevel as Object of Research in the Scientific Economic Literature of Contemporary Russia

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 9 (no. 3),

The idea of distinguishing the meso-level of economic analysis, filling the gap between macro and micro levels, is by no means new. It has not found a proper recognition and development in the work of representatives of the economic mainstream, but, on the contrary, steadily attracts the attention of the supporters of the heterodox directions of economic science. In this article, we propose a retrospective analysis of the development of the meso-level idea of economic analysis done by Russian economists. Three main directions of the development of the theory of mesoeconomic research are singled out: 1) a systematic approach: understanding the meso-level as a process of intra-industry interactions between economic agents with the goal of harmonizing the economic system; 2) Regional-spatial approach; 3) Theoretical approach of methodological institutionalism, developed within the framework of interdisciplinary intersections of economics and sociology. It is noted that the selected directions do not contradict and, on the contrary, complement each other. The development of the theory of mesoeconomics in the paradigm of the Kleiner-formula, which equates the object of mesoeconomics research with the space of formation of institutions and the institutions themselves, opens broad prospects for the development of the meso-level of economic analysis within the framework of institutional research. The practical need to separate the meso-level as a separate hierarchical stage of the economic structure, traditionally consisting of macro- and microlevels, is explained both by the need to expand the methodological tools of economic science and practical necessity, since it is assumed that meso-level is the space for the formation and consolidation of innovative solutions needed to ensure Growth.


Keywords: meso-level, meso-level of analysis, economic mainstream, heterodox economics, institutions, methodological institutionalism

References:
  • Braginskiy, O. B. (2012). Methodology and Practice of Working out Multyindustry Complex Program (an Example of Petrochemical Complex). Journal of New Economic Association, 4, 127–147. (In Russian).
  • Dementiev, V. V. (2002). Theory of the national economy and the mesoeconomic theory. Russian Economic Journal, 4, 71–82. [PDF-version of the article: URL: http://www.cemi.rssi.ru/publication/e-publishing/dementiev/old/REJ4-2002.pdf (Access Date: 28.06. 2017)] (In Russian).
  • Demyanenko, A. N. (2013). Mesoeconomics... is now about development (Notes on the Margins of the Book «Mesoeconomics of Development»). Spatial economics, 1, 144–170. (In Russian).
  • Dopfer, K. (2008). Origins of mesoeconomics. Evolutionary theory, the theory of selfreproduction and economic development. Materials of the 7th International Symposium on the Evolutionary Economy, September 14–15, 2007, Pushchino, Moscow Region. M: IE RAS. pp. 101–127. (In Russian).
  • Fligstin, N. (2001). Fields, power and social skills: a critical analysis of the new institutional trends. Economic Sociology. Electronic journal, 2(4), 28–55. (In Russian).
  • Frolov, D. P. (2015). Do Institutions Matter in Spatial Economics? Spatial Economics, 1, 14–37. (In Russian).
  • Frolov, D. P. (2016). Methodological institutionalism 2.0: From institutions to institutional configurations. Issues of Economics, 7, 147–160. (In Russian).
  • Gareev, T. R. (2010a). Institutes and economic development at the sub-regional (meso-) level. Social sciences and modernity, 5, 45–58. (In Russian).
  • Gareev, T. R. (2010b). Regional institutionalism: terra incognita or terra ficta? Journal of Institutional Studies, 2, 27–37. (In Russian).
  • Gasanov, E. A., Boyko, T. S. and Frolova, N. S. (2016). Key areas of innovation theory mesoeconomics. Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship, 12–2 (77–2), 211–216. (In Russian).
  • Gelvanovsky, M., Zhukovskaya, V. and Trofimova, I. (1998). Competitiveness in micro, meso- and macrolevel measurements. Russian Economic Journal, 3, 67–78. (In Russian).
  • Gorobnyak, A. A. (2016). Providing innovative sustainability in the construction industry at the micro- and meso-level. Economy and Entrepreneurship, 4–1 (69–1), 702–705. (In Russian).
  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan (reprinted 2007).
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2013). Methodological Individualism and Methodological Institutionalism. Issues of Economics, 10, 66–89. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2014). Interdisciplinary Studies in Economics and Sociology: Problems of Methodology. Social Sciences and Modernity, 5, 60–75. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2015). Methodological institutionalism and the importance of meso-level of social analysis. Sociological Studies, 12, 51–59. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2016). Between macro and micro: methodological problems of meso-level analysis of the economy. New Research in Heterodox Economics: Russian Contribution. Monograph. Moscow, IE RAS. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2016). Institutions and geography in economic development: a Heterodox economic discussion // Spatial Economics. 3, 130–150 (In Russian).
  • Kleiner, G. B. (2003). Mesoeconomic problems of the Russian economy. The economic bulletin of the Rostov State University, 1(2), 11–18. (In Russian).
  • Lazhentsev, V. N. (2015). Socio-economic geography and interdisciplinary synthesis in the study of the russian north and arctic. Spatial Economics, 4, 117–130. (In Russian).
  • Markov, L. S, Yagolnitser, M. A. (2008). Mesoeconomic systems: typology problems. Region: Economics and Sociology, 1, 18–44. (In Russian).
  • Markov, L. S., Markova, V. M., Kazantsev, K. Yu. and Yagolnitser, M. A. (2011). Structure and regulation innovative activity at mesolevel. Bulletin of NSU. Series: Socio-economic sciences, 11(3), 145–155. (In Russian).
  • Mesoeconomics of the transition period: markets, industries, enterprises. (2001). Moscow: Nauka, 516 p. [PDF-version: URL: http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mezo_kleiner_pr1.pdf (Access Date: 28.06. 2017)]. (In Russian).
  • Mesoeconomics of development / ed. Member of corr. RAS G.B. Kleiner (2011). Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Nauka, 805 p. [PDF-version: URL: http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Mezo-razv1.pdf (Access Date: June 28, 2017)]. (In Russian).
  • Minakir, P. А. (2014). Economic Analysis аnd Measurements: Spatial Case. Spatial Economics, 1, 12–39. (In Russian).
  • Milner, B. Z. (2002). Mesoeconomy of Transition Period: Markets, Branches and Enterprises. Issues of Economics, 2, 151–153. (In Russian).
  • Orehovskiy, P. A. (2015). Structure of the economic knowledge field: the possibilities and limits of public discussions. Social Sciences and the Present, 1, 5–23. (In Russian).
  • Petrakov, N. Y. (2011). Development of the Russian Mezoeconomy (Review of the Book «Mezoeconomy Development»). Economics of Contemporary Russia», 4, 129–132. (In Russian).
  • Plohuta-Plakutina, Yu. I. (2008). “Meso-level” of the banking system in Russia: concept, signs, subject composition. The legal world, 5, 44–49. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2011). Establishment of a common social analysis. Social Sciences and Modernity, 2, 101–111. (In Russian).
  • Popov, E. V. (2007). Evolution of Minieconomical Institutions. Moscow, « Nauka Publishers». (In Russian).
  • Rubinshtein, A. Ya. (2012). Social Liberalism: to the Question of Economic Methodology. Social Sciences and Modernity, 6, 13–34. (In Russian).
  • Rubwalter, D. D. (2001). Review of the monograph “Mesoeconomics of the Transition Period: Markets, Industries, Enterprises”. Economic Science of Modern Russia, 4, 173–176. (In Russian).
  • Shulic, D. N. (2011). Hierarchical analysis meso-level facilities. Regional problems of transforming the economy, 3, 26–32. (In Russian).
  • Stelmakh, V. S. (2016). Meso-level of the anti-crisis management system. In the collection: Actual aspects of the development of innovative mesoeconomics. Collection of articles on the materials of the international scientific and practical correspondence conference. Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law, pp. 37–42. (In Russian).
  • Tishkov, S. V. (2015). Management of the formation and development of innovative subsystems at the meso-level. Issues of Management, 3 (15), 158–165. (In Russian).
Publisher: