Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Industry Platforms and New Industrial Policy in Russia

Industry Platforms and New Industrial Policy in Russia

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 8 (no. 4),

The article aims at clarifying Russian industrial policy as a result of business models changing and market reconstruction. The research bass on the hypothesis that the choice of the industrial policy administrative measures depends on the object of management. It is important to link government regulation of markets with corporate strategies. We reveal that modern economic systems based on using of electronic technologies, big data, and innovative activity. Technological platforms as the single organizational and economic mechanisms affect economic systems very much. We study the content and main characteristics of a business model, is called the "technological platform". We also identify the main required changes in industrial policy. We analyze the matching between scientific and technological scenarios of the Russian economic development and the technological platform. There are two areas of the new industrial policy. They are: a multi-sectoral approach to regulating and improving the quality of the national institutional environment. The industrial and cluster management approaches are inefficient in modern conditions. There is a need for each platform of its technological development scenario. We also clarify the role of the state in the functioning of technological platforms.


Keywords: industrial policy, platform-technology, new industrialization, technological standard, industrial enterprise

References:
  • Abalkin, L. I. (1997). Conceptual issues of industrial policy in the conditions of modern Russian economy. In: Russia’s industrial policy at the turn of the 21st century. Moscow: IzdAT Publ., pp. 28–33. (In Russian).
  • Auzan, A. A. (2009). Institutional blocking in transformational economies and the possibility of overcoming them / Materials for seminar. Moscow. (In Russian).
  • Baden-Fuller, C., Giudici, A., Haefliger, S. and Morgan, M.S. (2015). Ideal types, values, profits and technologies. London: London School of Economics.
  • Chang, H-J. (1994). The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London: Macmillan Press.
  • Colombo, M. G., Mohommadi, A. and Lamastra, C. R. (2015). Innovative Business Models for High-tech Entrepreneurial Ventures / In: Business Model Innovation: The Organizational Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 170–193.
  • Dubosson-Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2002). E-business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5–23.
  • Gawer, A. and Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive industry innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Global trends and prospects for scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation: brief theses / Materials of the XVIII April International Conf., Moscow, 11–14 April. 2017 / L.M. Gokhberg, A.V. Sokolov, A.A. Chulok and others. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. (In Russian).
  • Gref, G. (2017). New technological trends and models of effective management / Open lecture from 9.06.2017 (http://yeltsin.ru/news/lekciya-germana-grefa/ – Date Access: 20.07. 2017). (In Russian).
  • Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (2004). Smart Regulation Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ipatova, A. V. (2016). On the Development Directions of Industrial Policy Institutions in Modern Economy. Journal of Economic Regulation, 7(4), 72–86. (In Russian).
  • Kondratyev, V. B. (2015). Industries and sectors of the global economy: characteristics and development trends. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russian).
  • Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J. and Yamashiro, S. (2000). Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell Computer Corporation. The Information Society,
  • 16(1), 5–21.
  • Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kudryashova, E. N. (2004). Institutional Agreements in the Conditions of Natural Monopoly. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian).
  • Kuznetsov, B. V. and Simachev, Yu. V. (2014). Evolution of the state industrial policy in Russia. The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2(22), 152–178. (In Russian).
  • Kuzminov, Ya., Radaev, V. and Yasin, E. (2013). Institutions for achieving growth. Experience of Russian reforms and possible institutional changes / High School of Economics. Reports of 2002–2005. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ., 441–503. (In Russian).
  • Nikitaeva, A. Y. (2016). Activization of the Industrial Development on the Platform of Partnership: Measures of State Regulation. Journal of Economic Regulation, 7(4), 20–31. (In Russian).
  • Orekhova, S. V. (2017). Industrial Policy: Evolution of Scientific Approaches, Russian Specifics and the Impact on Enterprises’ Competitiveness. Izvestiya of Ural State university of Economics, 1(69), 117–132.
  • Orekhova, S. V. and Romanova, O. А. Transformation of an Industrial Enterprise’s Business Model at Different Stages of the Life Cycle. The Manager, 5(63), 2–15. (In Russian).
  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. and Clark, T. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
  • Pack, H. and Saggi, K. (2006). The case for industrial policy: a critical survey / paper. (http://siteresources.World bank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/ InternalTraining/HowardPack_KamalSaggiPaper.pdf – Accsess Date: 15.07.2017).
  • Polterovich, V. M. and Popov, V. V. (2006). An evolutionary theory of economic policy. Part I. The experience of fast development. Voprosy ekonomiki – The Issues of Economics, 7, 4-23. (In Russian).
  • Price, V. (1981). Industrial Policies in the European Community. London, Macmillian.
  •  Rasmussen, K. and Foss, N. (2015). Business Model Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry / In: Business Model Innovation: The Organizational Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–269.
  • Regulatory Impact Assessment: Towards Better Regulation? (2007) / Ed. by Colin Kirkpatrick & David Parker. Cheltenham.
  • Riccaboni, M., Rossi, A. and Schiavo, S. (2013). Global Networks of Trade and Bits. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 8(1), 33–56.
  • Ruus, J., Pike, S. and Fernström, L. (2007). Intellectual Capital: Management Practice. S.-Petersburg: Higher School of Management Publ.; S.-Petersburg University Publ. (In Russian).
  • Sabatier, V., Mangematin, V. and Rousselle, T. (2010). From Recipe to Dinner: Business Model Portfolios in the European Biopharmaceutical Industry. Long Range Planning, 43, 431–447.
  • Sampson, T. (2016). Dynamic selection: an idea flows theory of entry, trade, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 315–380.
  • Shafer, S., Smith, H. and Linder, J. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48(3), 199–207.
  • Shevchenko, I. K., Razvadovskaya, Yu. V. and Khanina, A. V. (2016). Cluster as the Institute of Reindustrialization Territorial and Industrial Complexes. Journal of Economic Regulation, 7(1), 74–83. (In Russian).
  • Svinarenko, A. G., Kuzminov, Ya. I., Kuznetsov, B. V., Ponomarev, A. V., Simachev, Yu. V., Fridlyanov, V. N. and Yakovlev, A. A. (2013). The main directions of structural policy And45–78. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2017). Industrial policy: to a new understanding. Izvestiya of Ural State university of Economics, 5(73), in print. (In Russian).
  • Teece, D. J. (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172–194.
  • Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3–8.
  • Warwick, K. (2013). Industrial Policy – Emerging Issues and New Trends / The Babbage Industrial Policy, Lecture Series. (http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Research/Babbage/Warwick.pdf – Access Date: 10.07.2017).
  • Williamson, O. (1996). Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, “relational” contracting. S.-Petersburg: Lenizdat; CEV Press (In Russian).
  • Yasin, E. G. (2017). Development of the post-Soviet economy: from the past to the future / Materials of the XVIII April International Conf., Moscow, 11–14 April 2017. M.: Higher School of Economics Publ. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6047
ISSN: 2078-5429