Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Inequality, Social Justice and Welfare

Inequality, Social Justice and Welfare

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 7 (no. 3),

Researching the redistribution processes in the framework of welfare economics is primarily carried out through the analysis of implementation opportunity of the social justice principle. Distributive justice involves the redistribution of income and resources in proportion to certain criteria. However, there is still no consensus on these criteria, which would clearly judge the fairness of the distribution.Individual needs, rights, desert or specific contributions of citizens in the development of society, the product outcomes, and many others can be served as the justice criteria. According to an egalitarian tradition, if not identified relevant distinguishing criteria, we can talk about the existence of the presumption of equality.
 
Establishing equality means the advantages elimination of one individual over others. The paper attempts to analyze the egalitarian policies measures to implementation of equal opportunities, treatment and results, which ideally should neutralize all negative effects of a high degree of social inequality and achieve the desired goals of social policy. The paper also provides the argument concerning the realization possibility of the general equality idea. The author focuses on the existence of the exclusions in the equality policy - on the idea of «positive discrimination», which determines the appearance of conflicts between individual and public interests.


Keywords: social welfare; equality; social justice; individual and public interests; positive discrimination.

References:
  • Amdur R. (1979). Compensatory justice: the questions of costs. Political Theory, no. 7(2), pp. 229-244.
  • Averkieva E. S. (2014). Theoretical and methodological aspects of the social welfare analysis. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 44-61. (In Russian).
  • Averkieva E. S. (2016). Individual freedom and the social welfare. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 51-61 (doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.2.051-061).
  • Brennan G. and Friedman D. (1981). A libertarian perspective on welfare. In: P. G. Brown, C. Johnson, P. Vernier (eds.). Income support: conceptual and policy issues. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa N.J.
  • Charvet J. (1983). The idea of equality as a substantive principle of society, in W. Letwin (ed.). Against equality. London, Macmillan.
  • Chigvintseva E. S. (2011). Social welfare: the role of the welfare state institution. The Innovative Model of Economic Development: Materials of Interregional Scientific-Practical Conference with International Participation. / Ed. by N. S. Sadovin, T. B. Kozhevnikova. Yoshkar-Ola, Publ. House of the Mari State University, vol. 18, pp. 96-99. (In Russian).
  • Crosland C. A. R. (1956). The future of socialism. London, Jonathan Cape.
  • DES (UK Department of Education and Science) (1967). Central Advisory Council on Education (England). Children and their primary schools, vol. 1, HMSO.
  • Dworkin R. (1978). Taking rights seriously. London, Duckworth.
  • Dworkin R. (1985). A matter of principle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
  • Friedman M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Hayek F. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty, vol. 2: the mirage of social justice. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Hume D. (1996). Treatise of Human Nature // In 2 vols., vol. 1. Moscow, Thought [Mysl]. (In Russian).
  • Kashnikov B. N. (2001). The concept of the common equity of Aristotle: Reconstruction Experience. Ethical Thought, vol. 2, pp. 89-117. (In Russian).
  • Kropotkin P. (2002). Anarchy: Coll. / Comp. and Preface by R. K. Balandin. Moscow, Iris Press, 576 p. (In Russian).
  • Miller D. (1976). Social justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Nozick R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Pareto V. (1953). On the economic phenomenon. International Economic Papers, no. 3, pp. 188-194.
  • Rae D. (1981). Equalities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
  • Rawls J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Rawls J. (1982). Social unity and primary goods. In: A. Sen, B. Williams (eds.) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Samuelson P. (2003). Foundations of economic analysis. Moscow, Publ. House «School of Economics» [Shkola Ekonomiki]. (In Russian).
  • Schaar J. H. (1971). Equality of opportunity, and beyond. In: A de Crespigny, A Wertheimer (eds.) Contemporary political theory. London, Nelson.
  • Schoek H. (1969). Envy (trans. G. M. Glenny, B. Ross). New York, Harcourt Brace and World.
  • Spencer G. (2015). Justice. Moscow, Lamartis Publ. (In Russian).
  • Spicker P. (2013). Principles of social welfare: an introduction to thinking about the welfare state. Routledge.
  • Tawney R. H. (1964[1931]). Equality. London, Unwin.
  • Thomson J. A. K. (1953). The Ethics of Aristotle. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
  • Titmuss R. M. (1968). Commitment to welfare. London, George Allen and Unwin.
  • Walzer M. (1984). Welfare, membership and need. In: M. Sandel (ed.) Liberalism and its critics. Oxford, Blackwell.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6047
ISSN: 2078-5429