Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Reduction methods of the corruption risks in the public procurement sphere

Reduction methods of the corruption risks in the public procurement sphere

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 6 (no. 4),

While the dominant place in the Russian state policy against corruption belongs to the struggle against low-level corruption, virtually, high-level corruption is tending to be ignored. In these conditions it is highly important to analyze international experience for the reduction of its risks. The fact that the issue is closely connected to politics in order to satisfy the needs of public sector, is exacerbated more by the huge sums of public expenditures and simultaneously growing losses because of the corruption. Author analyzes international experience of the corruption restriction in the public procurement system beginning with the UN Convention against corruption and ending with the modern widely spread in international practice method of disqualification. The comparative analysis of international and Russian anti-corruption policies in the public procurement sphere was conducted. The author substantiated the methods of corruption revelation and the ways of resistance towards corruption which help to reduce the losses. In the final analysis complex arrangements for the corruption restriction were proposed.


Keywords: corruption; officials; public procurement; rent-seeking; corruption types; disqualification; administrative, legal and social methods; registers; lex imperfecta; lex simulata

References:
  • Arrowsmith S. (1998). Towards a Multilateral Agreement on Transparency in Government Procurement. International and Comparative Law Quarterly.
  • Arrowsmith S. (2005). The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement. 2nd ed. London, Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Belokrylov K. A. and Tsygankov S. S. (2013). Institutional Modernization of the Public Procurement Mechanism in the context the Transformation to Contractual System (the Example of the Southern Federal University). Terra Economicus, vol. 11, no. 4, part 2. (In Russian).
  • Belokrylova O. S. and Voropaeva S. V. (2011). Institutional Modernization of the Public Procurement Market: Principles, Methods, Directions. Rostov-on-Don, Publ. House “Assistance – XXI Century”. (In Russian).
  • Beviglia-Zampetti A. (1997). The UNCITRAL Model Law on Procurement of Goods, Construction, Services // Hoekman B., Mavrodis P. (eds). Law and Policy in Public Purchasing: The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement. Michigan, University of Michigan Press.
  • Bueb J. P. and Ehlermann-Cache N. (2005). Inventory of Mechanisms to Disguise Corruption in the Bidding Process and Some Tools for Prevention and Detection // Fighting Corruption and Promoting Integrity in Public Procurement. Paris, OECD.
  • Hansen J. (2003). Limits of Competition: Accountability in Government Contracting. Yale Law Journal, no. 112.
  • Hors I. (2003). Shedding Light on Corrupt Practices in Public Procurement. Public Procurement Law Review, no. 5.
  • Key V. (1989). Techniques of Political Graft // Heidenheimer A., Johnston M., LeVine V. (eds). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Jersey, Transaction Publishers.
  • Kuz’min V. (2015). The Budget and that’s all. The Russian Newspaper, October 22. (In Russian).
  • Measures to Prevent Corruption in EU Member States // European Parliament Directorate General for Research Working Paper. Legal Affairs Series JURI. 101 EN 03-1998.
  • Nichols P., Siedel G. and Kasdin M. (2004). Corruption as a Pan-CulturalPhenomenon: An Empirical Study in Countries at Opposite Ends of the Former SovietEmpire. Texas International Law Journal, no. 39.
  • Presidential Decree of 08.04.1997 № 305 "On Priority Measures for Preventing Corruption and Reducing Budget Expenditures in the Establishment of the Procurement for State Needs". The Russian Newspaper, 1997, April 15th. (In Russian).
  • Priess H. J. (2002). Distortions of Competition in Tender Proceedings: How to deal with Conficts of Interest (Family Ties, Business Links and Cross-Representation of Contracting Authority Offcials and Bidders) and the Involvement of Project Consultants. Public Procurement Law Review, no. 11.
  • Putin V. V. (2015). We have no right to be exposed. The Russian Newspaper, December 4. (In Russian).
  • Rasemen V. M. (1988). The Hidden Lie. Briberies: “the Crusades” and the Reforms. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian).
  • The Index of the Corruption Perception, 2015. (http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014 – Access Date: 20.11.2015). (In Russian).
  • United Nations Convention against Corruption. New York, UNITED NATIONS, 2004. (http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/index.html#UNCACfulltext – Access Date: 20.11.2015).
  • Vorotnikov V. P. (2004). Preventing the Shadow State Transformation of Russian Society. The Issues and Solutions. Moscow, RITS ISPI the RAS. (in Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6047
ISSN: 2078-5429