Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Theoretical and methodological aspects of the social welfare analysis

Theoretical and methodological aspects of the social welfare analysis

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 5 (no. 4),
p. 44-61

Social welfare - the subject of study of welfare economics, in which the efficient allocation offactors of production and income is analyzed. Since the main problem of social welfare theory is to substantiate the optimum ratio of productive efficiency and social justice within the framework of the current economic system, it is advisable to determine the social welfare content as a category, its structure and growth factors, to measure the level.
In the concepts related to welfare economics, a dichotomy reveals. On the one hand, they assess the achieved level of welfare of all society members, and analyze the relations arising about its maximization; On the other hand, they prove the criterion to achieve economic optimum means of distribution and redistribution processes, but do not offer a concrete way to measure social welfare due to the impossibility of objective evaluation and comparison of individual utility of commodity bundles, i.e., the existence of value judgments.
The author provides categorical analysis of the social welfare; reveals the completeness degree of the content of social welfare in economic thought in retrospect; shows the evolution of social welfare functions based on individual utility of consumed goods.


Keywords: social welfare, social justice, economic efficiency, individual preferences, interpersonal comparisons

References:
  • Dupuit J. (1993). On the measure of the usefulness of civil structures. The theory of consumer behavior and demand. St. Petersburg, Publ. House «School of Economics» [Shkola Economiki] [Dupuit A. J. E. J. (1844): De la mesure de l’utilite des travaux publics, Annales des ponts et chaussees, Second series]. (In Russian).
  • Lachmann V. (2008). National economy: foundations and challenges. Moscow, Walters Kluvers Publ. (In Russian).
  • Marshall A. (1993). Principles of Economics, vol. 1. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian).
  • Ricardo D. (2007). On the principles of political economy and taxation. In: Experience on the impact of low prices of bread on capital gains. Moscow, Eksmo Publ. (In Russian).
  • Rawls J. (2010). A theory of justice. / Transl. by V. Karpovich, A. Shevchenko. Moscow, LCI Publ. (In Russian).
  • Samuelson P. (2003). Foundations of economic analysis. Moscow, Publ. House «School of Economics» [Shkola Economiki]. (In Russian).
  • Sen A. K. (2004). Liberty, unanimity and rights. Milestones of Economic Thought, vol. 4. Welfare Economics and Public Choice. Moscow, Publ. House «School of Economics» [Shkola Economiki], TEIS, pp. 195-248. (In Russian).
  • Arrow K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. The Journal of Political Economy. Aug., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 328-346.
  • Bergson A. (1938). A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Feb., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 310-334
  • Blackorby C. and Donaldson D. (1990). A review article: the case against the use of the sum of compensating variations in cost-benefit analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 471-494.
  • Cobb C. IE(2000). Measurement tools and the quality of life. Redefining progress. San Francisco.
  • Diener E., Lucas R. E. and Oishi S. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of
  • happiness and a proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 63-73.
  • Ericsson R. (1993). Description of inequality: The Swedish approach to welfare research. The quality of life. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Foster J. and Sen A. (1997). On economic inequality. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Harsanyi J. C. (1955). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 309-321.
  • Hicks J. R. (1939). The foundations of welfare economics. Economic Journal. Dec., no. LXLX, pp. 696-712.
  • Kahneman D. and Krueger A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3-24.
  • Kaldor N. (1939). Welfare propositions in economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal. Sept., no. LXIX, pp. 549—552.
  • Kaneko M. and Nakemura K. (1979). The Nash social welfare function. Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 423-435.
  • Little I. M. D. (1960). A critique of welfare economics. London, Oxford University Press.
  • Long N. V. (2007). A mixed Bentham-Rawls criterion for intergenerational equity. Cirano. Scientific Series, no. 8, pp. 1-51.
  • Mueller D. C. (1979). Public choice. London, Cambridge University Press.
  • Pareto V. (1953). On the economic phenomenon. International Economic Papers, no. 3, pp. 188-194.
  • Petersen H.-G. (2004). Redistribution and the efficiency-justice trade-off. Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeitrage, no. 42, pp. 1-40.
  • Pigou A. C. (1932). Economics of welfare, 4th edition. London, Macmillan and Co. Scitovsky T. (1942). A reconsideration of the theory of tariffs. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 89-110.
  • Sen A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures, 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, no. 82, pp. 169-221.
  • Slesnick D. T. (1998). Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 2108-2165.
  • Tahlin M. (1988). Politics, dynamics and individualism — The Swedish approach to level of living research. Social Indicators Research,vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155-180.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2078-5429