Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

The influence of institutional environment on the operation and development of national innovation systems

The influence of institutional environment on the operation and development of national innovation systems

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 5 (no. 4),
p. 26-43

The institutional characteristics of the Russian national innovation system have been examined in the paper The authors have analyzed the correlation between innovative activity and a country’s level of economic development. The quality of the inner institutional environment is assumed as an important factor in increasing innovative activity of national economies. Diverse motives and incentives of the actors, interacting in the same institutional environment, can cause the lack of coordination between their interests and objectives. Meanwhile, the process of knowledge spillover provides for adaptation to new institutional circumstances and that is how actors' interests can be transformed. The authors assume that institutional underdevelopment, path dependence, ceremonial dominance and general level of trust affect the development of the national innovation system to a great extent. Much attention has been paid to the issues of government regulation and financing of innovations in the Russian Federation.


Keywords: institutional environment; institutions; national innovation system; economic development

References:
  • Volchik V. V. (2013). Reformation of the Russian Higher Education System: the role of myths and institutions. Terra Economics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 94-103. (In Russian).
  • Golichenko O.(2014). Russian National Innovation System: The state of things and paths of development. Voprosy Economiki, no. 7, pp. 35-50. (In Russian).
  • Gontmakher E. (2010). Russian Modernization: Institutional Traps and Civilization Landmarks. International Economics and International Relations, no. 10, pp. 3-11. (In Russian).
  • Gokhberg L., Kitova G. and Roud V. (2014) Tax Incentives for R&D and Innovation: Demand versus Effects. Foresight-Russia, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 18-41. (In Russian).
  • Grinberg R. and Rubinstein A. (2010). Theory, Innovations, and Features of New Economy in the Dialogue with K. Arrow. Voprosy Economiki, no. 10, pp. 5-16. (In Russian).
  • Gutsalenko L. A. (2011). Social innovations and quasi-innovations: human dimension. Sociological Studies, no. 7, pp. 15-25. (In Russian).
  • Efremenko D. V. and Meleshkina E. Yu. (2014). Modernization theory on the routes of social economic development. Sociological Studies, no. 6, pp. 3-12. (In Russian).
  • Kazak M. and Levashov A. (2009). How to force «Gazprom» and oil industry invest in innovations? CNews. 30.11.2009. (http://www.cnews.ru/reviews/index.shtml?2009/11/30/371525 — Access Date: 28.11.2014). (In Russian).
  • Kozikov A. A. (2013). The role of imitation in the formation of innovative economy. Innovative development of Russia: issues and solutions. Monograph edited by Eskindarov M. A., Silvestrov S. N. Moscow, Ankil. Publ. (In Russian).
  • Lebedeva N. M., Bushina E. V. and Cherkasova L. L. (2013). Values, social capital and relation to innovations. Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 4, pp. 28-41. (In Russian).
  • Meissner D. (2012). The Economic Impact of Spillovers from R&D and Innovation. Foresight-Russia, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 20-31. (In Russian).
  • Malkina M. Yu. (2011). Institutional traps of innovative development in the Russian economy. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50-60. (In Russian).
  • Pavlov P. N., Zharinov A. A. and Kaukin A. S. (2012). Empirical studies of innovative economies. Ed. by Pavlov P.N. Moscow, Publ. House Case [Delo]. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich V. M. (2009). The issue of the foundation of National Innovation System. Economics and Mathematical Methods, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 3-18. (In Russian).
  • Rosenberg N. and Birdzell L. E. (1995). How The West Grew Rich. Novosibirsk, Publ. Ekor. (In Russian).
  • Sablin K. S. (2012). The role of institutional environment in the formation of development institutions. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 32-41. (In Russian).
  • Seligman A. (2002). The Problem of Trust. Moscow, Idea-Press Publ. (In Russian).
  • Shilov A. (2011). Innovation economics: science, government and business. Economic Issues, no. 1, pp. 127-137. (In Russian).
  • Andersen B. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights: Innovation, Governance and the Institutional Environment, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Anton J. J., Greene H. and Yao D. A. (2006). Policy Implications of Weak Patent Rights. Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 6, pp. 1-26.
  • Arthur W. B. (2007). The Structure of Invention. Research Policy, no. 36, pp. 274­287.
  • Arthur W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology. What It Is and How It Evolves, London, Penguin Books Ltd.
  • Bush P. (1987). The Theory of Institutional Change. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. XXI, no. 3, pp. 1078-1102.
  • Eurostat. European Commission. (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/science_technology_innovation/introduction — Access Date: 28.11.2014).
  • Fukuyama F.(2000). Social capital and civil society. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, April, pp. 3-18.
  • Gilbert. R. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition- innovative debate? Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 6, pp. 159-215.
  • Heraud J-A. and Levy R. (2005). University-Industry Relationships and Regional Innovation System: Analysis of the French Procedure Cifre. Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Edited by Llerena P. and Matt M. Berlin: Springer, pp. 193­220.
  • Inglehart R. and Welzel C. (2009). Development and Democracy: What We Know about Modernization Today. Foreign Affairs, March, pp. 33-41.
  • Inglehart R. and Welzel C. (2010). Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy. Reflections, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 551-555.
  • Kamien M. I. and Schwartz N. L. (1975). Market structure and innovation: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, no. 1, pp. 1-37.
  • Lipset S. M. (1960). Political Man. Garden City (NY), Doubleday.
  • Olson M. Jr. (1995). The Devolution of the Nordic and Teutonic Economies. American Economic Review, v. 85, no. 2, pp. 22-27.
  • The World Bank. Data. (http://data.worldbank.org/topic/science-and-technology - Access Date: 28.11.2014)
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2078-5429