Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Informal network interaction in reducing the risk of poverty and social vulnerability (on the example of Rostov region)

Informal network interaction in reducing the risk of poverty and social vulnerability (on the example of Rostov region)

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 4 (no. 4),
p. 13-22

The potential of a network exchange and network mutual aid in smoothing of consequences ofpoverty and decrease in risks of social vulnerability and isolation is considered in the paper. Authors state a low mark respondents of a role of the state and public organizations in overcoming of poverty problems and social risks and the high social capital of the related relations. The data provided in the paper, conclusions and recommendations are based on a basis of 110 respondents given of deep interviewing - representatives of various social and demographic groups in Rostov-on-Don and the Rostov region.


Keywords: poverty; social vulnerability; informal network exchanges; gifts; poverty measure

References:
  • Barsukova S. (2003). The network mutual aid of the Russian households: economy of gifts theory and practice. World Russia, no. 2, pp. 81-90. (in Russian).
  • Barsukova S. (2006). Non-market exchanges between the Russian households. P. I. Reciprocated theory. Essence and functions reciprocated exchanges. (http://ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16212570). (in Russian).
  • Barsukova S. (2012). The informal economy: concept, studying history, research approaches. Sociological researches, pp. 31-39. (in Russian).
  • Poverty and inequality in modern Russia: 10 years later. Analytical report, 2013. (http://www.isras.ru/analytical_report_bednost_ineravenstva.html). (in Russian).
  • Volchik V. (2012) Trust problems and modernization of institutions. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 12-18. (in Russian).
  • Godelye M. (2007). Gift riddle. M.: East literature, 295 p. (in Russian).
  • World bank’s report about Russian economy, 2013. (http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/eca/RER29-RUS.pdf). (in Russian).
  • Income and social services: inequality, vulnerability, poverty / L. N. Ovcharova; NISP. M.: HSE, 2005. (in Russian).
  • Korchagina I. (2012). The human development measurement in the aspect of limiting access to its development resources. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68-78. (in Russian).
  • Coleman J. (2001). Social and human capital. Social sciences and modernity, no. 3, pp. 121-139. (in Russian).
  • Latov Yu. (2010). What is social capital of modern Russia? (comparative analysis of interpersonal and institutional trust). Leontyevsky readings (e-magazine), no. 7, pp. 216-230. (in Russian).
  • Ovcharova L. (2011). Poverty in modern Russia: policy and monitoring priorities. (http://2020strategy.ru/g9/documents/32642062.html). (in Russian).
  • The forecast of long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation for the period till 2030, 2013. (http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/macro/prognoz/doc20130325_06). (in Russian).
  • Reutov E., Kolpina L. and Reutova M. (2012). Social networks and daily practices of the population in the Belgorod region. Sociological researches, no. 1, pp. 34-41. (in Russian).
  • Reutov E., Kolpina L. Reutova M. and Boyarinova I. (2011). The social networks efficiency in regional community. Sociological researches, no. 1, pp. 81-89. (in Russian).
  • Sasaki M, Latov Yu., Romashkina G. and Davydenko V. (2010). Trust in modern Russia. VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, no. 2, pp. 83-102. (in Russian).
  • The social and labor spheres conditions in the village and offers on its regulation. The annual report by monitoring results. M.: «Rosinformagrotekh», 2013, vol. 14, pp. 118. (in Russian).
  • Festi P. and Prokofieva L. M. (2008). Family solidarity isn’t as before: freak of the imagination or reality / Measurement, forms and poverty factors: comparative approach / Ed. by P. Festi and L. Prokofieva. Paris: INED, pp. 197-206. (in Russian).
  • Steinberg I. (2004). Psychology of nonequivalent exchanges in networks of social support of city and rural families. The public opinions messenger, no. 6. (74) November-December, pp. 52-57. (in Russian).
  • Molm L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social psychology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 119-131.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2078-5429